Legal Opinion

Northern States Power Co. v. Commissioner of Revenue

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided November 20, 1997No. C9-97-698PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

PAGE, Justice.

Northern States Power Company (“NSP”) and United Power Association (“UPA”) sepa rately purchased step-down, load tap, and line transformers between June 1, 1990, and March 31, 1994, for use in their business operations. Each paid the Minnesota sales tax on the transformers they purchased and then each filed for refunds of those taxes, claiming that the transformers are exempt from the sales tax as capital equipment under Minn.Stat. § 297A.25, subd. 42 (1992). The Commissioner of Revenue denied their refund claims, finding that none of the transformers qualified as exempt…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Minnesota Power & L. Co. v. Personal Prop. Tax, Etc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1970
  2. Nagaraja v. Commissioner of RevenueSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
  3. County of Washington v. American Federation of State, County & Municipal Employees, Council No. 91Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1978

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Chapman v. Commissioner of RevenueSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2002
  2. Sprint Spectrum LP v. Commissioner of RevenueSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2004
  3. In Re the Welfare of S.N.R.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2000
  4. McLane Minnesota, Inc. v. Commissioner of RevenueSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2009
  5. In Re Matter of HildebrandtCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2005

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API