Legal Opinion

In Re the Welfare of S.N.R.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided September 1, 2000No. C2-00-179PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

WILLIS, Judge

Appellant Carole Freeman argues that the juvenile court erred in concluding that the Indian Child Welfare Act, 25 U.S.C. §§ 1901-1963 (1994), is applicable to adoption proceedings involving S.N.R. and in granting summary judgment to respondent Hennepin County Department of Children and Family Services and dismissing Freeman’s petition to adopt S.N.R. We affirm.

FACTS

S.N.R. was born in April 1993. Soon after her birth, respondent Hennepin County Department of Children and Family Services (“HCDCFS”) placed S.N.R. in the licensed foster care of C.G., whose partner was…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Santa Clara Pueblo v. MartinezSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. Mississippi Band of Choctaw Indians v. HolyfieldSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  3. Montana v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  4. State Ex Rel. Cooper v. FrenchSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1990
  5. Fabio v. BellomoSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1993

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Phillip A. C. v. Central Council of the Tlingit & Haida Tribes of AlaskaNevada Supreme Court · 2006
  2. In the Matter of Adoption of CdNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2008
  3. Department of Social & Health Services v. B.D.W.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2001
  4. In Re the Welfare of the Children of R.M.B.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2007
  5. In re the Welfare of the Child of E.A.C.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2012

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API