Legal Opinion
Monroe v. Standard Oil Co.
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided June 17, 1981No. 80-298PublishedCited by 141 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Stewart
The Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit concluded that 38 U. S. C. § 2021 (b) (3), a provision of the Vietnam Era Veterans’ Readjustment Assistance Act of 1974, does not require an employer to provide preferential scheduling of work hours for an employee who must be absent from work to fulfill his military reserve obligations. 613 F. 2d 641. We granted certiorari to consider the petitioner’s contention that an employer has a statutory duty to make work-scheduling accommodations for reservist-employees not made for other employees, whenever such accommodations reasonably can be…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Southeastern Community College v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Alabama Power Co. v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Coffy v. Republic Steel Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Frederick D. Peel v. Florida Department of Transportation, Tom B. Webb, Jr., as SecretaryCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1979
- Oakley v. Louisville & Nashville RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by141 opinions
- Lehman v. NakshianSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- William M. Gummo v. Village of Depew, New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1996
- Sheehan v. Department of the NavyCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2001
- John C. Leisek v. Brightwood Corporation, an Active Oregon CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
- Velázquez-García v. Horizon Lines of Puerto Rico, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2007
136 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.