Legal Opinion

Oakley v. Louisville & N. Ry. Co.

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided November 22, 1948No. 10648PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McALLIS.TER, Circuit Judge.

Appellant commenced working for the Louisville and Nashville Railroad Company as an apprentice machinist at Louisville, Kentucky, on July 1, 1938, and in 1941, was promoted to the position of machinist at the same place. In 1943, he gave up his seniority' rights in that place in order to be transferred to the yards of the railroad company at Loyall, Kentucky, as a locomotive machinist. On July 6, 1943, he began work in that capacity at Loyall and established seniority there as of that date. He continued in such employment until May 7, 1944, when he was inducted into…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Trailmobile Co. v. WhirlsSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  2. Trailmobile Co. v. WhirlsCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1946

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Oakley v. Louisville & Nashville RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
  2. Zaversnik v. Union Pac. R.District Court, D. Wyoming · 1949
  3. Haynes v. Southern Railway SystemCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1948

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API