Legal Opinion

Calder v. SBC Pension Benefit Plan

District Court, W.D. Texas

Decided March 27, 2008No. 2:07-mj-00340PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

XAVIER RODRIGUEZ, District Judge.

On this date, the Court considered Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim (docket no. 64), Plaintiffs’ Response (docket no. 83), and Defendants’ Reply (docket no. 95). After careful consideration, the Court will deny the motion.

I. Background

This case was originally filed on February 28, 2006 in the Northern District of Illinois by Charles Calder and Leslie Vaughn-Smith 1 , former management employees of AT & T, on behalf of themselves and a putative class of participants in the AT & T Pension Benefit Plan. 2 Plaintiffs seek a…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  2. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. BruchSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  3. Van Dusen v. BarrackSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  4. In Re Katrina Canal Breaches LitigationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2007
  5. Massachusetts Mutual Life Insurance v. RussellSupreme Court of the United States · 1985

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Hakim v. Accenture United States Pension PlanDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2009
  2. Herod v. DMS Solutions IncDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API