Legal Opinion

Lollar v. A.O. Smith Harvestore Products, Inc.

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided July 10, 1990No. WD 42537PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GAITAN, Judge.

Appellant, A.O. Smith Harvestore Products, Inc. (“AOSHPI”), appeals the jury verdict rendered in favor of respondent, Wayne Lollar d/b/a Lollar Farms (“Lol-lar”) for fraud in the amounts of $426,000 actual and $500,000 punitive damages. The alleged fraud occurred when appellant represented its feed storage equipment to be “oxygen-limiting,” yet referred to its process as oxygen eliminating in its brochures and videotaped advertising upon which respondent relied. The respondent’s petition was initially in three counts. However, both count I, breach of implied warranty, and count…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Browning-Ferris Industries of Vermont, Inc. v. Kelco Disposal, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
  2. Burnett v. GriffithSupreme Court of Missouri · 1989
  3. Hudson v. CarrSupreme Court of Missouri · 1984
  4. Heberer v. Shell Oil Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1988
  5. Cantrell v. Superior Loan Corp.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1980

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Hess v. Chase Manhattan Bank, USA, N.A.Supreme Court of Missouri · 2007
  2. First National Bank of Louisville v. Brooks FarmsTennessee Supreme Court · 1991
  3. Cabinet Distributors, Inc. v. RedmondMissouri Court of Appeals · 1998
  4. Wagner v. UffmanMissouri Court of Appeals · 1994
  5. Parker v. MVBA Harvestore SystemsCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1992

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API