Legal Opinion
Tarrant Wholesale Drug Co. v. Kendall
Court of Appeals of Texas
Decided October 19, 1949No. 11961PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
NORVELL, Justice.
Appellant submits this appeal upon six points of error. The appellees present serious objections to our consideration of any of these points because of the lack of proper foundation in the motion for new trial. Two of the points (the third and sixth) seek to question the sufficiency of the evidence to support the jury’s findings' in answer to Special Issues Nos. 4 and 16.-The sixth point, relating to Special Issue-No. 16, asserts that said issue was not A controlling one. Even if this contention be true, it appears that appellant was not prejudiced in any way, consequently,…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- State v. Tyler County State BankTexas Commission of Appeals · 1925
- Root & Fehl v. Murray Tool Co.Texas Commission of Appeals · 1930
- Day-Luellwitz Lumber Co. v. SerrellAppellate Court of Illinois · 1913
- State v. Tyler County State BankTexas Commission of Appeals · 1926
- Willis v. City Nat. Bank of GalvestonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1925
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Johnson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2018
- Wertz v. Richardson Heights Bank and TrustTexas Supreme Court · 1973
- Pennsylvania v. Curtiss National Bank of Miami SpringsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1970
- City of Mesquite v. RawlinsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1966
- Groves v. SawyerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1964
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.