State v. Tyler County State Bank
Texas Commission of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtShort, J.
While the consideration of the motion for a rehearing has served only to-intensify our conviction that the original opinion correctly decided, the material matters involved in tMs case, yet, in deference to the earnestness of counsel representing defendants in error, we have concluded to write further on the subject.
• The ax-gument of counsel representing defendants in error in support of the motion for rehearing is based upon two major proposi*212tions, one being that a county depository is a distinct entity created by statute entirely separate and independent of tbe bank wbicli happens to have…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Kidder v. HallTexas Supreme Court · 1923
- Middlekauff v. State Banking BoardTexas Supreme Court · 1922
- Watson v. El Paso CountyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1918
- Eastland County v. ChapmanTexas Commission of Appeals · 1925
- State Nat. Bank v. Encinal Mercantile Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1925
3Cited by14 opinions
- Meaders v. BiskampTexas Supreme Court · 1958
- New Amsterdam Casualty Co. v. First Nat. Bank of GilmerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1939
- Reynolds v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1936
- Tarrant Wholesale Drug Co. v. KendallCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1949
- State of Oregon Ex Rel. v. DobsonOregon Supreme Court · 1952
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.