Legal Opinion

Root & Fehl v. Murray Tool Co.

Texas Commission of Appeals

Decided April 9, 1930No. 1175—5497PublishedCited by 33 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLeddy, J.

Defendant in error filed a suit against plaintiff in error upon a verified account, and was met by a plea of accord and satisfaction.

The following special issues were submitted to, and answered by, the jury:(1) “On October 14th, 1926¡ was there a controversy existing between the parties to this suit over the claim sued upon? Answer yes or no. Answer ‘Yes.’ ”(2) “Was such controversy, if any, urged in good faith by the defendants? Answer Yes or No. Answer ‘Yes.’ ”(3) “On October 14th, 19-26, when the defendants delivered a check of $254.71, was it agreed between the parties that this would be…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. First National Bank of Amarillo v. RushTexas Commission of Appeals · 1922
  2. Simms Oil Co. v. American Refining Co.Texas Commission of Appeals · 1926
  3. Buford v. Inge Const. Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1925
  4. Hunt v. OgdenCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1910
  5. Daugherty v. HerndonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1901

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. Industrial Life Insurance Company v. FinleyTexas Supreme Court · 1964
  2. Knutson v. RipsonTexas Supreme Court · 1962
  3. Phillips Petroleum Co. v. Rau Const. Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1942
  4. Call of Houston, Inc. v. MulveyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1961
  5. City of Mesquite v. RawlinsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1966

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API