State v. Tyler County State Bank
Texas Commission of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtShort, J.
Between the 9th day of February, 1919, and the 28th day of March, 1921, the Tyler County State Bank of Woodville was a duly incorporated and going concern under the laws of the state of Texas as a bank of discount and deposit, and elected to operate under the depositors’ guaranty fund pjan. On the 10th day of February, 1919, said bank was duly appointed by the commissioners’ court of Tyler county, Tex., the depository for Tyler county, Tex., during the statutory period of two years. On the 13th day of February, 1919, it' qualified as such depository by giving bond, which was duly approved.…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Johnson v. Amarillo Improvement Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1895
- Middlekauff v. State Banking BoardTexas Supreme Court · 1922
- Lummus Cotton Gin Co. v. WalkerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1916
- Cranston v. West Coast Life InsuranceOregon Supreme Court · 1912
- Walker v. SellersSupreme Court of Alabama · 1918
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by34 opinions
- Meaders v. BiskampTexas Supreme Court · 1958
- Gulf Production Co. v. Continental Oil Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1942
- C. C. Duke and C. T. Duke v. Sun Oil Company and Pan American Petroleum CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1963
- Wertz v. Richardson Heights Bank and TrustTexas Supreme Court · 1973
- Priem v. ShiresCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1985
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.