United States v. Bernays
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Appeal from the Circuit Court of the United States for the Eastern District of Missouri. The case as presented on this appeal involved consideration of No. 11 of the rules of the United States Circuit Courts of Appeals, 150 Fed. xxvii, 79 C. C. A. xx,vii, the pertinent part of which reads as follows: “11. Assignment of Errors.
Read the full summary
Appeal from the Circuit Court of the United States for the Eastern District of Missouri. The case as presented on this appeal involved consideration of No. 11 of the rules of the United States Circuit Courts of Appeals, 150 Fed. xxvii, 79 C. C. A. xx,vii, the pertinent part of which reads as follows: “11. Assignment of Errors. The * * * appellant shall file * * * an assignment of errors, which shall set out separately and particularly each error asserted and intended to be urged. * * * Errors not assigned according to this rule will be disregarded, but the court, at its option, may notice a…
1Opinion of the Court
ADAMS, Circuit Judge.
A. C. Bernays, the intestate, prior to his death and while a resident of the United States, brought in from Yokohama when returning from a foreign tour certain articles of merchandise consisting of pictures, chairs, tables, and some other small trinkets, none of which are embraced within the terms “wearing apparel, articles of personal adornment, toilet articles, and similar personal effects.” The surveyor of customs at the port of St. Louis, where entry was made, denied free entry because the merchandise was not brought in on the same ship with the importer, and because…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Dollar Savings Bank v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1874
- United States v. One Pearl NecklaceCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1901
- Boston Safe-Deposit & Trust Co. v. HudsonCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1895
- United States v. Scruggs, Vandervoort & Barney Dry Goods Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1907
- United States v. HartsDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1904
3Cited by13 opinions
- United States v. 353 Cases Mountain Valley Mineral Water Mountain Valley Sales Company, a Corporation, John G. Scott, and H. B. McFarlingCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1957
- Bayha v. Public Utility District No. 1Washington Supreme Court · 1939
- Central Improvement Co. v. Cambria Steel Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1912
- Schmidt v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1933
- New York Life Ins. Co. v. RankinCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1908
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.