United States v. Harts
District Court, N.D. California
At Law. Action for penal duties on merchandise imported in violation of customs laws. Note Buckley v. U. S., 4. How. 251, 11 L. Ed. 961, and Dodge v. U. S., 131 Fed. 849, herewith.
1Opinion of the Court
DF HAVEN, District Judge.
This action is prosecuted by" the United States under section 2802 of the Revised Statutes [U. S. Comp. St. 1901, p. 1873]. It is alleged in the declaration that the defendant came from Japan to the port of San Francisco on the United States transport Thomas, bringing with him certain baggage, and that in making entry of the same before the collector of customs he did not mention certain dutiable articles contained therein of the value *887of $657.04, and by reason thereof judgment is demanded against him for the sum of $1,971.12, three times the alleged value of the…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- United States v. One Pearl NecklaceCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1901
- United States v. DominiciCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1897
- United States v. One Pearl NecklaceDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1900
3Cited by3 opinions
- United States v. BernaysCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1908
- United States v. A Lot of Silk Goods & Other MerchandiseDistrict Court, D. Hawaii · 1912
- United States v. Sixteen Bolts of SilkDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1904