Legal Opinion
Dreidel v. City of Louisville
Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)
Decided May 18, 1937PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion op the Court by
Judge Baird
Affirming
The only, question involved on this appeal: Did the act known in common parlance as the “Bar Act,” being sections 101-1, 101-2, Kentucky Statutes (chapter 3, Acts 1934), repeal, either by express terms or implication, section 3011, Kentucky Statutes? The lower court adjudged that it did not. From that judgment, this appeal is prosecuted.
Anton B. Dreidel, a practicing attorney, in good standing, in the City of Louisville, Ky., suing for himself, and all other attorneys practicing in the city, has instituted this action to prevent the City of…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Kentucky Institution for Blind v. City of LouisvilleCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1906
- Exall v. HollandCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1915
- City of Pineville v. MeeksCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1934
- Thomas v. Hurst Home InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1919
- Campbell County Election Commission v. WeberCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1931
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Labelle v. Hennepin County Bar Assn.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1939
- Smith v. Louis Berkman Co.District Court, W.D. Kentucky · 1995
- Sandstrom v. City of Fort LauderdaleDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1961
- Hallahan v. SawyerCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1965
- Washburn, Mayor v. Paducah Newspapers, Inc.Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1938
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.