Legal Opinion

Exall v. Holland

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided October 20, 1915PublishedCited by 23 opinions

Appeal from McCracken Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion op the Court by

Judge Hurt.

Affirming.

The appellees, Tory Holland and Sally Holland, are the joint owners of á tract of nine acres of land, which. *317is situated in McCracken County, Kentucky, between the Broadway and Blandville public roads, and Joe Exall, tbe appellant, is the owner of lands, which lie between the lands of appellees and the Broadway public road. In pursuance of section 4349, Ky. Statutes, Carroll, 1909, the appellees gave the appellant notice of an intended application to be made by them to the county court to have condemned, for their benefit, a private pass way over…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Craft ex rel. Powell v. WebsterSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1833
  2. Brodie v. BickleySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1830
  3. City of Louisville v. Louisville Water Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1899
  4. Commonwealth v. WellerCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1878
  5. Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. WardCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1912

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. Kentucky Jockey ClubCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1931
  2. South v. FishCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1918
  3. Houston v. BoltzCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1916
  4. Graham v. JewellCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1924
  5. District Board of Tuberculosis Sanatorium Trustees v. BradleyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1920

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API