Legal Opinion

Detar v. Coast Venture XXVX, Inc.

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided December 24, 2002No. AC 22189PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*320 Opinion

SCHALLER, J.

The defendant, Coast Venture XXVX, Inc., appeals from the judgment, rendered after a trial to the court, in favor of the plaintiff, Frederick W. Detar. On appeal, the defendant claims that the court (1) improperly concluded that the liquidated damages clause of the underlying contract was inapplicable under the circumstances of this case and (2) incorrectly calculated the damages it awarded to the plaintiff. We agree and reverse, in part, the judgment of the court.

The following facts and procedural history are relevant to our resolution of the defendant’s appeal. In July,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Tallmadge Bros. v. Iroquois Gas Transmission System, L.P.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2000
  2. Town of Berlin v. Nobel InsuranceConnecticut Appellate Court · 2000

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Colliers, Dow & Condon, Inc. v. SchwartzConnecticut Appellate Court · 2003
  2. Sanders v. DiasConnecticut Appellate Court · 2008
  3. Detar v. Coast Venture XXVX, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2005
  4. First Union National Bank v. Eppoliti Realty Co.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2007
  5. Small Business Transportation, Inc. v. ABC Stores, LLCConnecticut Appellate Court · 2006

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API