State v. Ayers, 21657 (7-6-2007)

OPINION

{¶ 1} Defendant-appellant David Ayers Jr. appeals from an order classifying him as a sexual predator. He contends that the evidence does not support the order, and that the order is against the manifest weight of the evidence.

{¶ 2} We conclude that the trial court's decision is supported by the record. Accordingly, the order from which this appeal is taken is Affirmed.

I

{¶ 3} In 1996, David Ayers was indicted on one count of Kidnapping, three counts of Rape and one count of Aggravated Robbery. Ayers pled no contest to the charge of Kidnapping, in violation of R.C. 2905.01(A)(4). The…