Legal Opinion

State v. Shough, Unpublished Decision (2-18-2005)

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided February 18, 2005No. 20531UnpublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

{¶ 1} Defendant, Joseph Shough, appeals from his conviction and sentence for pandering obscenity involving a minor and his designation as a sexual predator.

{¶ 2} As a result of having on his computer 1,500 images of children engaged in sexual acts, Defendant was indicted on twenty-one counts of pandering obscenity involving a minor, R.C. 2907.321(A)(1), and twenty-one counts of illegal use of a minor in nudity oriented material. R.C.2907.323(A)(1). Pursuant to a plea agreement, Defendant entered pleas of guilty to twelve counts of pandering obscenity involving a minor. All other…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. State v. AdamsOhio Supreme Court · 1980
  2. State v. CookOhio Supreme Court · 1998
  3. State v. EppingerOhio Supreme Court · 2001
  4. State v. ThompsonOhio Supreme Court · 2001
  5. State v. EppingerOhio Supreme Court · 2001

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State v. Gebbie, C-060505 (6-22-2007)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2007
  2. State v. Ayers, 21657 (7-6-2007)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API