State v. Shough, Unpublished Decision (2-18-2005)
Ohio Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
{¶ 1} Defendant, Joseph Shough, appeals from his conviction and sentence for pandering obscenity involving a minor and his designation as a sexual predator.
{¶ 2} As a result of having on his computer 1,500 images of children engaged in sexual acts, Defendant was indicted on twenty-one counts of pandering obscenity involving a minor, R.C. 2907.321(A)(1), and twenty-one counts of illegal use of a minor in nudity oriented material. R.C.2907.323(A)(1). Pursuant to a plea agreement, Defendant entered pleas of guilty to twelve counts of pandering obscenity involving a minor. All other…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- State v. AdamsOhio Supreme Court · 1980
- State v. CookOhio Supreme Court · 1998
- State v. EppingerOhio Supreme Court · 2001
- State v. ThompsonOhio Supreme Court · 2001
- State v. EppingerOhio Supreme Court · 2001
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- State v. Gebbie, C-060505 (6-22-2007)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2007
- State v. Ayers, 21657 (7-6-2007)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2007