Legal Opinion
State v. Thompson
Ohio Supreme Court
Decided August 22, 2001No. 2000-1555PublishedCited by 29 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
[This decision has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 92 Ohio St. 3d 584.] THE STATE OF OHIO, APPELLANT, v. THOMPSON, APPELLEE. [Cite as State v. Thompson,
2001-Ohio-1288.] Criminal law—Sexual predators—Judge must consider guidelines set out in R.C. 2950.09(B)(2) but has discretion to determine what weight, if any, will be assigned to each guideline—Pursuant to R.C. 2950.09(B)(2), a judge may also consider any other evidence deemed relevant to determine likelihood of recidivism—R.C. 2950.09(B)(2) does not violate separation-of-powers doctrine. (No. 00-1555—Submitted May 30,…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Henley v. City of Youngstown Board of Zoning AppealsOhio Supreme Court · 2000
- State v. WilliamsOhio Supreme Court · 2000
- State v. KeenanOhio Supreme Court · 1998
- State v. EppingerOhio Supreme Court · 2001
- State v. HochhauslerOhio Supreme Court · 1996
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- State v. Ferguson, 88450 (6-7-2007)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2007
- State v. Ruhlman, Unpublished Decision (5-1-2006)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2006
- State v. Basham, Ct2007-0010 (12-26-2007)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2007
- State v. Farr, 13-06-16 (6-25-2007)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2007
- State v. Lay, 2007-Ca-08 (9-28-2007)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2007
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.