Legal Opinion

City of Rome v. Southern Railway Co.

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided November 24, 1934No. 22725PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMacIntyre, J.

The Supreme Court, in the case of Southern Ry. Co. v. City of Rome, 179 Ga. 449 (176 S. E. 7), having held on certiorari that “under the provisions of sections 4588 and 5971 of the Civil Code (1910), the right of contribution extends equally to actions ex contractu and actions ex delicto, 'where all are equally bound to bear the common burden, and one has paid more than his share/” and that “the Court of Appeals erred in reversing the judgment of the superior court overruling the demurrer based upon the ground that the plaintiff, being a joint tort-feasor, was not entitled to contribution to…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Southern Railway Co. v. City of RomeSupreme Court of Georgia · 1934
  2. City of Fort Scott v. Kansas City, Fort Scott & Memphis RailroadSupreme Court of Kansas · 1903
  3. Dent v. King & Coombs ex rel. KingSupreme Court of Georgia · 1846
  4. Autry v. Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1928
  5. Dunn v. StufflebeamIdaho Supreme Court · 1910

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Wages v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1974
  2. Powell v. BarkerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1957
  3. Gerschick v. PoundsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2006
  4. Keyes v. DyerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1952

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API