Legal Opinion

Southern Railway Co. v. City of Rome

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided September 17, 1934No. 9986PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRussell, C. J.

(After stating the foregoing facts.) The Southern Railway Company, having paid Mrs. Autry in full, seeks by means of this action to compel the joint defendant in fi. fa., the City of Rome, to pay its aliquot part of their joint liability as evidenced by the execution. It would seem, upon principles of natural justice and equity, that as Mrs. Autry’s original action was against the defendants jointly, and since her recovery imposed equal liability on each of the defendants to her suit, the demand by the railway company is not ill founded. However, the city contends that the equitable doctrine…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Cox v. StricklandSupreme Court of Georgia · 1904
  2. Southern Railway Co. v. GrizzleSupreme Court of Georgia · 1906
  3. Central of Georgia Railway Co. v. BrownSupreme Court of Georgia · 1901
  4. Mashburn & Co. v. Dannenberg Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1903
  5. Central of Georgia Railway Co. v. Macon Railway & Light Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1913

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. García Molina v. Gobierno de la Capital y the Puerto Rican & American InsuranceSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1951
  2. Georgia Power Company v. BlumCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1949
  3. Union Camp Corp. v. HelmySupreme Court of Georgia · 1988
  4. FH Ross & Company v. WhiteSupreme Court of Georgia · 1968
  5. Gazaway v. NicholsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1940

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API