Wages v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Stolz, Judge.
1. Succinctly stated, the issue presented is, whether an insured co-defendant (Wages) with sufficient liability insurance to satisfy judgments rendered in favor of the plaintiffs (Harrisons) against said insured co-defendant (Wages) and an uninsured motorist (Black), is entitled to recover contribution and indemnification from the plaintiffs uninsured motorist carrier (State Farm). Our research indicates this to be an issue of first impression in Georgia.
There appears to be a division of opinion in jurisdictions where this issue has previously arisen.
One view is that the intent…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. MurphySupreme Court of Georgia · 1970
- Mutual Life Insurance v. DurdenCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1911
- Travelers Indemnity Co. v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1969
- Southern Railway Co. v. City of RomeSupreme Court of Georgia · 1934
- Powell v. BarkerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1957
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Smith v. Commercial Union Assurance Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1980
- Hinton v. Interstate Guaranty InsuranceSupreme Court of Georgia · 1997
- Arrow Exterminators, Inc. v. Zurich American InsuranceDistrict Court, N.D. Georgia · 2001
- Richmond County v. PierceSupreme Court of Georgia · 1975
- Jones v. Cotton States Mutual InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1987
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.