Autry v. Southern Railway Co.
Supreme Court of Georgia
1Opinion of the CourtHines, J.
The action against the two defendants was joint. Th'e jury returned a joiaat verdict against them. Judgment was entered up against them jointly. Each defendant filed a separate motion for new trial. Both motions were overruled. Each defendant sued out a separate bill of exceptions returnable to the Court of Appeals, to review the judgment overruling its motion for new trial. Each defendant, in order to supersede the judgment *139of the court below, filed separate supersedeas bonds with different sureties. Separate judgments were rendered by the Court of Appeals, affirming the separate judgment in…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Magid v. ByrdSupreme Court of Georgia · 1927
- Duke v. AyersSupreme Court of Georgia · 1927
- Peppers v. CoilSupreme Court of Georgia · 1901
3Cited by10 opinions
- Register v. Stone's Independent Oil Distributors, Inc.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1971
- Southern Railway Co. v. City of RomeSupreme Court of Georgia · 1934
- Snyder v. ElkanSupreme Court of Georgia · 1938
- Greyhound Lines, Inc. v. Cobb County, GeorgiaCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1982
- Pass v. PassSupreme Court of Georgia · 1942
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.