Paine v. Crane
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Action in the district court for Hennepin county to determine adverse claims to certain land. The case was tried before Dickinson, J., who made findings of fact and as conclusion of law found that plaintiff was entitled to judgment and entitled to the possession of the real estate, and that defendant had no estate in or lien upon the premises. From an order denying defendant’s motion for a new trial, he appealed.
1Opinion of the CourtStart, C. J.
Appeal from an order of the district court of the county of Hennepin denying the defendant’s motion for a new trial. The action was one to determine adverse claims to eighty acres of land. The complaint alleged that the plaintiff was the owner in fee of the land and in the possession thereof, and that the defendant claimed an adverse estate or interest therein or lien thereon. The answer admitted that the plaintiff was in the possession of the land, but denied that he was the owner thereof, and alleged that the defendant was the owner thereof. The cause was tried by the court without a jury.
On…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Halvorsen v. Moon & Kerr Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1902
- McManus v. Nichols-Chisholm Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1909
3Cited by7 opinions
- In Re Estate of ForsytheSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1946
- Windorski v. DoyleSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1945
- Beebe v. KleidonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1954
- Merchants & Farmers State Bank v. OlsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1933
- Clabots v. BadeauxSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1946
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.