Legal Opinion
Gomez v. Commissioner of Correction
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided December 12, 2017No. AC39328PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtLavine, J.
The petitioner, Jamie Gomez, appeals from the judgment of the habeas court denying his second petition for a writ of habeas corpus. Following that denial, the court granted his petition for certification to appeal. On appeal, the petitioner claims that the habeas court erred when it concluded that (1) his state and federal constitutional due process rights were not violated by the state's suppression of material exculpatory evidence concerning agreements or understandings that it allegedly had with two of its witnesses, (2)
the state did not violate his state and federal constitutional rights…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Giglio v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Napue v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
- Hinton v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 2014
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Gaskin v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2018
- Gomez v. Commissioner of CorrectionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2020
- Turner v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2018
- Brown v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2018
- Nicholson v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2018
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.