Legal Opinion

Nicholson v. Commissioner of Correction

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided December 4, 2018No. AC40101PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMoll, J.

The petitioner, Cargil Nicholson, appeals from the denial of his amended petition for a writ of habeas corpus following the denial of his petition for certification to appeal. On appeal, the petitioner claims that the habeas court (1) abused its discretion in denying his petition for certification to appeal, (2) erroneously concluded that he failed to establish that his state and federal constitutional rights to the effective assistance of counsel were violated, 1 (3) abused its discretion in declining to treat a witness at the habeas trial as an expert witness, and (4) abused its discretion…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Simms v. Warden, State PrisonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1994
  3. Hinton v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 2014
  4. Simms v. WardenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1994
  5. Lozada v. DeedsSupreme Court of the United States · 1991

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State v. FisherSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2022
  2. Brewer v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2019
  3. Maurice v. Chester Housing Associates Ltd. PartnershipConnecticut Appellate Court · 2019
  4. Inglis v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2022
  5. Nicholson v. Comm'r of Corr.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2019

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API