Legal Opinion

Hinton v. Alabama

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided February 24, 2014No. 13-6440PublishedCited by 428 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*1083 PER CURIAM.

*264 In Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668 , 104 S.Ct. 2052 , 80 L.Ed.2d 674 (1984), we held that a criminal defendant's Sixth Amendment right to counsel is violated if his trial attorney's performance falls below an objective standard of reasonableness and if there is a reasonable probability that the result of the trial would have been different absent the deficient act or omission. Id., at 687-688, 694 , 104 S.Ct. 2052 . Anthony Ray Hinton, an inmate on Alabama's death row, asks us to decide whether the Alabama courts correctly applied Strickland to his case. We conclude that…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Williams v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  3. Harrington v. RichterSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
  4. Padilla v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 2010
  5. Kimmelman v. MorrisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1986

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by428 opinions

  1. Glossip v. GrossSupreme Court of the United States · 2015
  2. Edward Thomas Kendrick, III v. State of TennesseeTennessee Supreme Court · 2015
  3. Ledford v. Warden, Georgia Diagnostic & Classification PrisonCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2016
  4. Linda Stermer v. Millicent WarrenCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2020
  5. Michael Wade Nance v. Warden, Georgia Diagnostic PrisonCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2019

423 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API