Hinton v. Alabama
Supreme Court of the United States
1Opinion of the Court
*1083 PER CURIAM.
*264 In Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668 , 104 S.Ct. 2052 , 80 L.Ed.2d 674 (1984), we held that a criminal defendant's Sixth Amendment right to counsel is violated if his trial attorney's performance falls below an objective standard of reasonableness and if there is a reasonable probability that the result of the trial would have been different absent the deficient act or omission. Id., at 687-688, 694 , 104 S.Ct. 2052 . Anthony Ray Hinton, an inmate on Alabama's death row, asks us to decide whether the Alabama courts correctly applied Strickland to his case. We conclude that…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Williams v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Harrington v. RichterSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
- Padilla v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 2010
- Kimmelman v. MorrisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by428 opinions
- Glossip v. GrossSupreme Court of the United States · 2015
- Edward Thomas Kendrick, III v. State of TennesseeTennessee Supreme Court · 2015
- Ledford v. Warden, Georgia Diagnostic & Classification PrisonCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2016
- Linda Stermer v. Millicent WarrenCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2020
- Michael Wade Nance v. Warden, Georgia Diagnostic PrisonCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2019
423 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.