Blase v. Pedlow
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtFord, J.
The plaintiff appeals from a judgment adverse to him in an action in which he sought an accounting and other relief.
The nature of the controversy may be discerned from the findings of fact of the trial court, pertinent portions of whch are as follows: 1. During the first part of 1955 and for sometime prior thereto, the defendants Fiorina Pedlow and Douglas Pedlow were engaged in the business of operating an auto towing and impounding establishment, doing business under the firm name and style of Pedlow’s 24-Hour Towing Service, in North Hollywood. 2. During the first part of 1955, plaintiff…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Bancroft-Whitney Co. v. McHughCalifornia Supreme Court · 1913
- Sears v. RuleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
- Tranchina v. ArcinasCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947
- Whann v. DoellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
- Meads v. DeenerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Heber v. YaegerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967