Heber v. Yaeger
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
COUGHLIN J.
Plaintiff appeals from a summary judgment in favor of defendant directing she take nothing by virtue of her amended complaint for partition and an accounting.
Plaintiff and defendant were joint owners of a life estate in three parcels of real property. Defendant also was the owner *261of the remainder estate in these parcels. Vesting of the aforesaid interests occurred by an agreement between the parties dated Aug. 10, 1944. Thereafter plaintiff, whose name then was Steeve, brought an action against defendant for declaratory relief and for an accounting. A judgment was entered therein…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Eagle Oil & Refining Co. v. PrenticeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
- Walsh v. WalshCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
- Coyne v. KrempelsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
- Dabney-Johnston Oil Corp. v. WaldenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
- Goodenow v. EwerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1860
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Murray v. Hull CA2/2California Court of Appeal · 2020