Legal Opinion

State v. Hitt

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided April 12, 1988No. TC 85-5802; CA A41513; SC S34214PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCarson, J.

This case concerns the breadth of ORS 133.693, 1 which allows a criminal defendant to contest “the good faith, accuracy and truthfulness of the affiant” upon motion to controvert a search warrant. The question presented is whether defendant may contest the accuracy and truthfulness of an informant’s statements included within a search warrant affidavit.

On October 29,1985, defendant was arrested for possession of heroin after a search of certain premises pursuant to a search warrant. The warrant was obtained upon the affidavit of a police officer. The affidavit stated, inter alia, that the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Franks v. DelawareSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. Lane County v. R. A. Heintz Construction Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1961
  3. State v. MontigueOregon Supreme Court · 1980
  4. State v. HarpOregon Supreme Court · 1985
  5. State v. CervantesNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1979

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. State v. YoungCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1991
  2. State v. CastillejaOregon Supreme Court · 2008
  3. State v. EsplinOregon Supreme Court · 1992
  4. State v. CoffeyOregon Supreme Court · 1990
  5. State v. SwansonOregon Supreme Court · 2011

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API