Legal Opinion

State v. Morrison/Bartee

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided May 22, 1991No. 88-07-1542-C, 88-07-1542-C4 CA A62301 (Control), CA A62627PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDe Muniz, J.

After a trial to the court on stipulated facts, defendants were convicted of manufacture and possession of a controlled substance. ORS 475.992(1), (4). They claim that the court erred in denying their motions to suppress and motions to controvert. We affirm.

A magistrate issued a warrant to search a farm near Burns for evidence of a marijuana grow operation inside a barn on the property. The police executed the warrant and seized evidence of the crime. Defendants moved to suppress all of that evidence, claiming that the search warrant was invalid, because the affidavit supporting it was…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Ball v. GladdenOregon Supreme Court · 1968
  2. State v. MillerOregon Supreme Court · 1985
  3. State v. AnspachOregon Supreme Court · 1984
  4. State v. HarpOregon Supreme Court · 1985
  5. State v. HughesCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1975

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State v. EvansCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1991
  2. State v. MorrisonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1991
  3. State v. HofferCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992
  4. State v. BurnsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1991
  5. State v. BurnsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1991

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API