Legal Opinion
Grenemyer v. Gunter
District Court, D. Colorado
Decided August 7, 1991No. Civ. A. 90-B-2166PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
BABCOCK, District Judge.
This case is before me on Chief Magistrate Judge Donald E. Abram’s recommen dation that petitioner’s 28 U.S.C. § 2254 petition be dismissed with prejudice.
Petitioner has filed timely specific objections to the recommendation. I review the recommendation de novo.
The Chief Magistrate Judge’s thorough and exhaustive analysis of petitioner’s claims is correct legally. Indeed, although petitioner may be eligible for parole, parole for him is discretionary, not mandatory. Grenemyer v. Gunter, 811 P.2d 1098 (Colo.1991). The Colorado Supreme Court’s definitive holding in…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Thomas v. ArnSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- United States v. RaddatzSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Mullaney v. WilburSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Greenholtz v. Inmates of the Nebraska Penal & Correctional ComplexSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Olim v. WakinekonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Morrow v. LaFleurSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1999
- White v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1994
- Hudson v. BOARD OF ADMINISTRATION ETC.California Court of Appeal · 1997
- Fultz v. EmbryCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1998
- Leach v. VoseSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1997
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.