Legal Opinion
Dye v. INDUSTRIAL COM'N OF ARIZONA
Arizona Supreme Court
Decided March 24, 1987No. CV-86-0481-PRPublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FELDMAN, Vice Chief Justice.
Under Arizona’s workers’ compensation scheme, injuries to certain body parts, such as arms and legs, are compensated according to a statutory schedule. 1 A.R.S. § 23-1044(B). The schedule limits compensation to a certain percentage of the claimant’s average monthly income for a set number of months. The percentage and number of months vary according to the injury. Id. In contrast, injuries affecting body parts not listed on the schedule entitle the claimant to “disability compensation equal to fifty-five percent of the difference between his average monthly wages…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Ronquillo v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1971
- Arnott v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1968
- Safeway Stores, Inc. v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1976
- Miller v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1973
- Eggleston v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1975
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Getson v. WM BANCORPCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1997
- M.C. DEAN, INC. v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA DEPARTMENT OF EMPLOYMENT SERVICES, & ANTHONY LAWSON, IntervenorDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2016
- Conner Manufacturing, Inc. v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1992
- Alva v. Industrial Com'n of ArizonaArizona Supreme Court · 1988
- M.C. DEAN, INC. v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA DEPARTMENT OF EMPLOYMENT SERVICES, & ANTHONY LAWSON, IntervenorDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2016
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.