Legal Opinion

Ronquillo v. Industrial Commission

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided November 11, 1971No. 10593-PRPublishedCited by 56 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CAMERON, Justice.

Pursuant to Rule 47, subd. b, Rules of the Supreme Court, 17 A.R.S. and § 12-120.24 A.R.S., we granted a petition for review of the decision of the Court of Appeals reported in 14 Ariz.App. 499, 484 P.2d 652 (1971), which affirmed an award of the Industrial Commission of Arizona finding that the petitioner was entitled to a “scheduled” award (§ 23-1044, subsec. A and subsec. D A.R.S.), rather than an “unscheduled” award (§ 23-1044, subsecs. C, D, and E A.R.S.). 1

We are called upon to determine whether a scheduled permanent partial disability when considered with a prior…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Ossic v. Verde Central MinesArizona Supreme Court · 1935
  2. McKinney v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1955
  3. Wollum v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1966
  4. Goodyear Aircraft Corp. v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1961
  5. Hurley v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1957

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by56 opinions

  1. Young v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2003
  2. Alsbrooks v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1978
  3. Fremont Indemnity Co. v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1985
  4. PFS v. Industrial Com'n of ArizonaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1997
  5. Morrison-Knudsen Co. v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1977

51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API