Union of Concerned Scientists v. Atomic Energy Commission and United States of America, Boston Edison Company, Intervenor
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
McGOWAN, Circuit Judge:
The Union of Concerned Scientists (UCS) seeks review of an order of the Atomic Energy Commission (AEC) affirming the Initial Decision of an Atomie Safety and Licensing Board (ASLB) to authorize the issuance of an operating license to intervenor Boston Edison Company (Edison) for its Pilgrim Nuclear Power Station (Pilgrim). UCS assigns ten separate errors, which we deal with sequentially after an introductory section stating so much of the history of this case as is necessary to an understanding of the issues raised. For the reasons hereinafter set forth, we affirm.
I
The…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Goldberg v. KellySupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Armstrong v. ManzoSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Arnett v. KennedySupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- United States v. Students Challenging Regulatory Agency Procedures (SCRAP)Supreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Service v. DullesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by55 opinions
- Mary Ann Kelly v. Railroad Retirement BoardCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1980
- Ims, P.C. v. Aida Alvarez, Administrator, United States Small Business AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1997
- Concerned About Trident v. Donald H. Rumsfeld, Individually and as Secretary of the Department of Defense (Two Cases)Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1977
- Panhandle Eastern Pipe Line Company v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, (Three Cases)Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1979
- Midtec Paper Corp. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1988
50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.