Legal Opinion
Concerned About Trident v. Donald H. Rumsfeld, Individually and as Secretary of the Department of Defense (Two Cases)
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Decided July 13, 1977No. 75-1515, 75-2053PublishedCited by 79 opinions
1Per curiam
The opinion of Judge Tamm is an opinion for the Court. While Judges Leventhal and Kaufman concur generally in that opinion, they wish to express certain refinements on the reasoning. In these respects the opinion of Judge Leventhal is also an opinion for the Court.
TAMM, Circuit Judge.
The appellants here, Concerned About Trident, et al. raise questions concerning the adequacy of the environmental impact statement (EIS) prepared under the supervision of the Navy for its newest atomic missile submarine system (Trident), located in Bangor, Washington. 1 In addition, they contend that the Navy…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Sierra Club v. MortonSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Association of Data Processing Service Organizations, Inc. v. CampSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- United States v. Students Challenging Regulatory Agency Procedures (SCRAP)Supreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Kleppe v. Sierra ClubSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Barlow v. CollinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by79 opinions
- Department of the Navy v. EganSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Mason County Medical Ass'n v. KnebelCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1977
- Mason County Medical Association v. KnebelCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1977
- National Wildlife Federation v. Robert F. Burford, Mountain States Legal Foundation (Two Cases)Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1987
- Coalition for Canyon Preservation v. Karl S. Bowers, Administrator, Federal Highway AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980
74 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.