Legal Opinion

Kyles v. Baker

District Court, N.D. California

Decided October 31, 2014No. Case No. 13-cv-04695-WHOPublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

Re: Dkt. No. 24

WILLIAM H. ORRICK, United States District Judge

INTRODUCTION

During an encounter with Pittsburg, California police officers on November 30, 2011, plaintiff Bruce Kyles was forced to the ground, tased multiple times, struck with a flashlight, and mauled by a police dog before being arrested and charged under California Penal Code sections 69 and 148(a)(1). Kyles claims the officers’ use of force against him was unprovoked; the officers assert that Kyles was verbally and physically resisting…

2Cases cited51 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  4. Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
  5. Graham v. ConnorSupreme Court of the United States · 1989

46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Warren v. MarcusDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2015
  2. Winder v. McMahonDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2018
  3. (PC) Hood v. RosenDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2025
  4. A. L. v. City of BakersfieldDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2025
  5. Abdullah v. City of San DiegoDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2021

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API