Legal Opinion

Pinehaven Planning Board v. Brooks

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided February 27, 2003No. 27751PublishedCited by 38 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TROUT, Chief Justice.

Appellants, Thomas J. and Jennifer Brooks (the “Brooks”), appeal from an order of summary judgment (1) declaring the short-term rental of their cabin in the Pinehaven Subdivision (“Subdivision”) in Island Park, Idaho a violation of the Subdivision’s restrictive covenants (“Covenants”) and (2) permanently enjoining the Brooks from renting and listing the residence for short-term use.

I

FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

In May 2000, the Brooks purchased residential property with a single-family dwelling in Island Park, Idaho. This property is located in the Pinehaven Subdivision…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Yogman v. ParrottOregon Supreme Court · 1997
  2. Rutter v. McLaughlinIdaho Supreme Court · 1980
  3. Munson v. Milton, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1997
  4. Aberdeen-Springfield Canal Co. v. PeiperIdaho Supreme Court · 1999
  5. City of Chubbuck v. City of PocatelloIdaho Supreme Court · 1995

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by38 opinions

  1. Tarr v. Timberwood Park Owners Ass'n, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 2018
  2. Greenough v. Farm Bureau Mut. Ins. Co. of IdahoIdaho Supreme Court · 2006
  3. Slaby v. Mountain River Estates Residential Ass'nCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2012
  4. Lowden v. BosleyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2006
  5. Swanson v. Beco Const. Co., Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 2007

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API