Legal Opinion
State v. Harkness
Washington Supreme Court
Decided September 7, 1938No. 27150. Department OnePublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtGeraghty, J.
— Rex Harkness, Lyle Harkness, and P. L. Sanders were charged, in a single information, with the violation of § 3 of chapter 47, Laws of 1923, p. 134 (Rem. Rev. Stat., §2509-3 [P. C. §4071-3]).
In each of three counts, identical in language except as to dates, it is charged that the defendant Rex Harkness, intending to commit a crime,
“. . . did, unlawfully and feloniously present to a druggist ... a physician’s prescription signed by one P. L. Sanders, a physician, for one half grain sulphate morphine and issued in the name of one O. H. Anderson, with intent by means thereof to procure from…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Frohwerk v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1919
- McElroy v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
- State v. BrunnWashington Supreme Court · 1927
- United States v. McConnellDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1923
- State v. ScollardWashington Supreme Court · 1923
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- State v. HarknessWashington Supreme Court · 1939
- Draper v. RhayDistrict Court, E.D. Washington · 1964
- People v. KurlandCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1973
- State v. MartinezWashington Supreme Court · 2024
- State v. MartinezWashington Supreme Court · 2024