State v. Harkness
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtJeffers, J.
In January, 1938, defendants in the actions now before us were, by the prosecuting attorney for Kitsap county, charged in a single information, in six different counts, with illegally procuring narcotics, in violation of Rem. Rev. Stat., § 2509-3 [P. C. § 4071-3]. Dr. P. L. Sanders was also charged in the same information with having illegally made the prescriptions. The counts in the first information, in so far as these defendants are concerned, were in the same language, except as to names and dates, as the language in the informations now before us.
Defendants demurred to the first…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- State v. Le PitreWashington Supreme Court · 1909
- State v. FindlingSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1913
- State v. SmithSupreme Court of Iowa · 1906
- State v. McCartySupreme Court of Iowa · 1930
- State v. TaylorSupreme Court of Missouri · 1929
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- State v. ManussierWashington Supreme Court · 1996
- State v. HolsworthWashington Supreme Court · 1980
- State v. HaggardIdaho Supreme Court · 1971
- State v. TongateWashington Supreme Court · 1980
- State v. FurthWashington Supreme Court · 1940
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.