Legal Opinion

People v. Kurland

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 29, 1973No. Crim. 22856PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

ASHBY, J.

By information appellant was charged in eight counts with eight violations of Business and Professions Code section 4390, alleging that he did “fraudulently make, pass, utter and publish a certain fictitious prescription for methamphetamine, knowing said prescription to be fictitious.” Appellant pleaded not guilty and not guilty by reason of insanity. Trial by jury and the right to confront witnesses were waived, and the cause was submitted on the testimony contained in the transcript of the preliminary hearing plus testimony by appellant in his own behalf. The court found…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. People v. BraddockCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
  2. People v. JackCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965
  3. Baker v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1972
  4. State v. HarknessWashington Supreme Court · 1938

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. People v. JacksonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1979
  2. People v. JacksonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1979

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API