Legal Opinion

Fisher v. Waste Management of Missouri

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided October 23, 2001No. SC 83477PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MICHAEL A. WOLFF, Judge.

When an employer makes surveillance videotapes of an injured employee, must the employer disclose the videotapes as “statements” under the workers’ compensation statute?

We hold that a surveillance videotape is a statement under section 287.2151 of the workers’ compensation law and, ■ as the statute provides, cannot be used unless disclosed after proper request has been made.

The Claim, Decision and Appeal

Michael Fisher filed workers’ compensation claims against his employer, Waste Management of Missouri, for injuries to his right shoulder occurring in June and September…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Sours v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 1980
  2. Wilkerson v. PrelutskySupreme Court of Missouri · 1997
  3. Budding v. SSM Healthcare SystemSupreme Court of Missouri · 2000
  4. A.B. v. FrankSupreme Court of Missouri · 1983
  5. State Ex Rel. Missouri Pacific Railroad v. KoehrSupreme Court of Missouri · 1993

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Anderson Ex Rel. Anderson v. Ken Kauffman & Sons Excavating, L.L.C.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2008
  2. HHC Medical Group, P.C. v. City of Creve Coeur Board of AdjustmentMissouri Court of Appeals · 2003
  3. State Ex Rel. Feltz v. Bob Sight Ford, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2011
  4. LeSage v. Dirt Cheap Cigarettes and Beer, Inc.Supreme Court of Missouri · 2003
  5. State Ex Rel. Nixon v. KarpierzSupreme Court of Missouri · 2003

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API