State Ex Rel. Missouri Pacific Railroad v. Koehr
Supreme Court of Missouri
1Opinion of the Court
HOLSTEIN, Judge.
“One •picture is worth more than 10,000 words.”
Chinese Proverb
The issue presented in this case is whether surveillance photographs or motion pictures are, as suggested by the adage, a “statement” of a party discoverable under Rule 56.01(b)(3). This Court concludes that such surveillance materials are discoverable under the rule.
In the underlying case John D. Brown, an engineer for defendants, seeks recovery for various injuries allegedly caused by defendants, relators in this proceeding. Plaintiff, in a request for production, sought:
All photographs or motion pictures taken of…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Wolff Shoe Co. v. Director of RevenueSupreme Court of Missouri · 1988
- DiMichel v. South Buffalo Railway Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1992
- Stiffelman v. AbramsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1983
- Cabral v. ArrudaSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1989
- In Re the Estate of HoughSupreme Court of Missouri · 1970
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Giddens v. Kansas City Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 2000
- State v. RoweSupreme Court of Missouri · 2002
- Bailey v. Hawthorn BankMissouri Court of Appeals · 2012
- State Ex Rel. Nixon v. EstesMissouri Court of Appeals · 2003
- Oliver v. Cameron Mutual Insurance Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1993
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.