Legal Opinion

Budding v. SSM Healthcare System

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided May 30, 2000No. SC 82214PublishedCited by 41 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HOLSTEIN, Judge.

Denise Budding sued SSM Healthcare System 1 (Hospital) for personal injuries arising from defectively designed Vitek 2 proplast teflon temporomandibular joint implants. Budding had the implants inserted at the Hospital and proceeded on a theory of strict product liability. The jury rendered a verdict in favor of the Hospital, and the trial court entered judgment accordingly. Budding appealed. Following opinion by the Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, the case was transferred here. This Court has jurisdiction. Mo. Const, art. V, sec. 10. The judgment of the trial…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Mahoney v. Doerhoff Surgical Services, Inc.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1991
  2. Butler v. Mitchell-Hugeback, Inc.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1995
  3. Carmichael v. ReitzCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1971
  4. Rodriguez v. Suzuki Motor Corp.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1999
  5. Silverhart v. Mount Zion HospitalCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1971

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by41 opinions

  1. Zeier v. Zimmer, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2006
  2. Ports Petroleum Co., Inc. of Ohio v. NixonSupreme Court of Missouri · 2001
  3. Anderson Ex Rel. Anderson v. Ken Kauffman & Sons Excavating, L.L.C.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2008
  4. Department of Social Services, Division of Medical Services v. Senior Citizens Nursing Home District of Ray CountyMissouri Court of Appeals · 2007
  5. Cooperative Home Care, Inc. v. City of St. LouisSupreme Court of Missouri · 2017

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API