State Ex Rel. Nixon v. Karpierz
Supreme Court of Missouri
1Opinion of the CourtRonnie L. White, J.
I
This case involves the Missouri Incarceration Reimbursement Act, sections 217.825 to 217.841. 1 After Appellant James L. McMullin secured judgment in favor of his incarcerated client, Vince Kar-pierz, the State initiated action to recover much of that judgment, including most of McMullin’s attorneys fees. Because the validity of the Act is called into question, this Court has jurisdiction. Mo. Const. ART. V, sec. 3. Reversed and remanded.
II
Karpierz’s incarceration stems from illegal drug activity. While incarcerated, Karpierz instituted a civil action against the Kansas City Board of Police…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Murphy v. CarronSupreme Court of Missouri · 1976
- Barnes v. GormanSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- State v. KempSupreme Court of Missouri · 1955
- Newman v. Ford Motor Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1998
- Luethans v. LuethansMissouri Court of Appeals · 1951
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- State Ex Rel. MoGas Pipeline LLC v. Missouri Public Service CommissionSupreme Court of Missouri · 2012
- Powell v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2005
- State Ex Rel. Nixon v. WorthyMissouri Court of Appeals · 2008
- State Ex Rel. Nixon v. BassSupreme Court of Missouri · 2009
- State Ex Rel. Nixon v. SmithMissouri Court of Appeals · 2008
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.