Russell City Energy Co. v. City of Hayward
California Court of Appeal, 5th District
1Opinion of the CourtJones, P.J.
*56The "Payments Clause" of an agreement between Russell City Energy Company, LLC (Russell) and the City of Hayward (City)
*57prohibited the City from imposing any taxes on the "development, construction, ownership and operation" of Russell's power plant except taxes tethered to ownership of real property. The question in this case is whether Russell's interpretation of the Payments Clause violates article XIII, section 31 of the California Constitution (Section 31) which provides "[t]he power to tax may not be surrendered or suspended by grant or contract."
*167The answer is yes. We conclude Russell's…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- Crowley v. KatlemanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1994
- Rutherford Holdings, LLC v. Plaza Del ReyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2014
- Klein v. Chevron U.S.A., Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2012
- Berka v. WoodwardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
- Professional Engineers in California Government v. KemptonCalifornia Supreme Court · 2007
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Enfinity CentralVal 2 Parlier LLC v. City of Parlier, CaliforniaDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2020
- In re KavanaughCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2021
- Prager University v. Google LLCCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2022
- Southern Inyo Healthcare District v. Optum Bank, Inc.United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. California · 2020
- Usher v. WhiteCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2021