S. S. Kresge Co. v. Garrick Realty Co.
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Fowi,er, J.
The appellant assigns as error that several of the findings of fact of the trial court are against the clear preponderance of the evidence and that as a consequence the judgment is erroneous. However it may be as to other findings, if any one of three of them is supported by the evidence the judgment must be affirmed, and we shall consider only these three. The three are, in substance, that (1) the wall is unsafe and dilapidated; (2) the plaintiff’s predecessor in title abandoned the wall as a party wall; (3) conditions have so changed as to render the purpose of the party-wall…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Partridge v. . Gilbert and OthersNew York Court of Appeals · 1857
- Bull v. . BurtonNew York Court of Appeals · 1919
- Heartt v. . KrugerNew York Court of Appeals · 1890
- Duncan v. RodeckerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1895
- Winston v. 524 West End Ave., Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1931
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Kruckenberg v. HarveyWisconsin Supreme Court · 2005
- Bruss v. Milwaukee Sporting Goods Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1967
- Niedfeldt v. EvansWisconsin Supreme Court · 1956
- State ex rel. Northwestern Development Corp. v. GehrzWisconsin Supreme Court · 1939
- Taxman v. McMahanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1963
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.