Legal Opinion

Partridge v. . Gilbert and Others

New York Court of Appeals

Decided September 5, 1857PublishedCited by 54 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.]

[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.]

[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] I am of opinion that the legal effect of the several conveyances to lots numbers eighteen and twenty, stated in the case, was to vest the title in the respective owners to the centre of the division…

2Cited by54 opinions

  1. Schile v. . BrokhahusNew York Court of Appeals · 1880
  2. Cole v. . HughesNew York Court of Appeals · 1873
  3. Brooks v. . CurtisNew York Court of Appeals · 1873
  4. Bull v. . BurtonNew York Court of Appeals · 1919
  5. Heartt v. . KrugerNew York Court of Appeals · 1890

49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API