Legal Opinion

Niedfeldt v. Evans

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided March 6, 1956PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBroadfoot, J.

Following the trial and before the entry of judgment, the plaintiff had moved for a new trial, for the following, among other reasons: Because the court erred in refusing to allow the plaintiff to prove the existence of a new and satisfactory road leading across plaintiff’s farm to the defendant’s farm and giving defendant ingress and egress to and from his farm; because the court erred in refusing to give an instruction requested by plaintiff that an easement ceases when the reason for its existence ceases; and because the court erred in instructing the jury that the fact that gates were…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. S. S. Kresge Co. v. Garrick Realty Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1932
  2. State v. HalvorsonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1925
  3. Schroeder v. MoeleyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1924

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. AKG REAL ESTATE, LLC v. KostermanWisconsin Supreme Court · 2006
  2. Ludke v. EganWisconsin Supreme Court · 1979
  3. Millen v. ThomasCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1996
  4. Wisconsin Public Service Corp. v. AndrewsCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2009
  5. Bode v. BodeCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1992

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API