White v. Allstate Insurance Co.
Indiana Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
ON PETITION TO TRANSFER
KRAHULIK, Justice.
This case concerns the defensive use of collateral estoppel in uninsured motorist litigation. Harvey and Carolyn White (Plaintiffs-Appellants below) seek transfer after the Court of Appeals affirmed the summary judgment granted against them and in favor of Allstate Insurance Company (Defendant-Appellee below) (“Allstate”). White v. Allstate Ins. Co. (1992), Ind.App., 591 N.E.2d 586. The dispositive issue is whether the Whites are collaterally estopped from relitigating the issue of a hit-and-run automobile. We hold that defensive use of collateral…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Blonder-Tongue Laboratories, Inc. v. University of Illinois FoundationSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Indiana Department of State Revenue v. Caylor-Nickel Clinic, P.C.Indiana Supreme Court · 1992
- Sullivan v. American Cas. Co. of Reading, Pa.Indiana Supreme Court · 1992
- White v. Allstate Insurance Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1992
3Cited by9 opinions
- Monat v. State Farm InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 2004
- Tom v. VoidaIndiana Court of Appeals · 1995
- Brougher Agency, Inc. v. United Home Life InsuranceIndiana Court of Appeals · 1993
- Connecticut Indemnity Company v. BowmanIndiana Court of Appeals · 1995
- Angela Brooks-Ngwenya v. Indianapolis Public SchoolsCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2019
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.