Legal Opinion

White v. Allstate Insurance Co.

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided December 22, 1992No. 43S03-9212-CV-1023PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ON PETITION TO TRANSFER

KRAHULIK, Justice.

This case concerns the defensive use of collateral estoppel in uninsured motorist litigation. Harvey and Carolyn White (Plaintiffs-Appellants below) seek transfer after the Court of Appeals affirmed the summary judgment granted against them and in favor of Allstate Insurance Company (Defendant-Appellee below) (“Allstate”). White v. Allstate Ins. Co. (1992), Ind.App., 591 N.E.2d 586. The dispositive issue is whether the Whites are collaterally estopped from relitigating the issue of a hit-and-run automobile. We hold that defensive use of collateral…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Blonder-Tongue Laboratories, Inc. v. University of Illinois FoundationSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Indiana Department of State Revenue v. Caylor-Nickel Clinic, P.C.Indiana Supreme Court · 1992
  3. Sullivan v. American Cas. Co. of Reading, Pa.Indiana Supreme Court · 1992
  4. White v. Allstate Insurance Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1992

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Monat v. State Farm InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 2004
  2. Tom v. VoidaIndiana Court of Appeals · 1995
  3. Brougher Agency, Inc. v. United Home Life InsuranceIndiana Court of Appeals · 1993
  4. Connecticut Indemnity Company v. BowmanIndiana Court of Appeals · 1995
  5. Angela Brooks-Ngwenya v. Indianapolis Public SchoolsCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2019

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API