Monat v. State Farm Insurance
Michigan Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtMarkman, J.
We granted leave to appeal in this case to examine the mutuality requirement of the doctrine of collateral estoppel. In this first-party, no-fault action, defendant seeks to invoke collateral estoppel to preclude plaintiff from relitigating an issue already decided in plaintiff’s third-party negligence action. Due only to a lack of mutuality, the Court of Appeals, in a split decision, affirmed the trial court’s denial of defendant’s motion for summary disposition. We hold that, where collateral estoppel is being asserted *681defensively against a party who has already had a full and fair…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Allen v. McCurrySupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Blonder-Tongue Laboratories, Inc. v. University of Illinois FoundationSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Bernhard v. Bank of America National Trust & Saving AssociationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
- Thomas M. McInnis & Associates, Inc. v. HallSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1986
- Panama Canal Co. v. Grace Line, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1958
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by172 opinions
- Linda McCormick v. Eric A. Braverman Citizens Insurance Company of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2006
- VanVorous v. BurmeisterMichigan Court of Appeals · 2004
- Rental Properties Owners Ass'n v. Kent County TreasurerMichigan Court of Appeals · 2014
- Chris Davis v. James GallagherCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2020
- Toran Peterson v. Richard JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2013
167 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.